[next] [prev] [up] Date: Wed, 15 Dec 93 09:58:00 -0500
[next] [prev] [up] From: Mark Longridge <mark.longridge@canrem.com >
~~~ ~~~ [up] Subject: Part 2

Hmmmm, a little inconsistent (sp?) with the notation there.
I usually only use U when quoting the processes of others.

I'm going to try tackling the 1152-fold symmetry idea
later tonight.

When looking for CD-type processes I find it helps to think
in terms of distinct states you pass through in approaching
the goal state. Sort of like factoring a composite pattern
into simpler ones you add together.

Rotating the cube in space definitely helps too.

-> Mark

[next] [prev] [up] [top] [help]